• Home
    • howdy everyone
    • for design professionals
    • for landscape contractors
    • for maintenance professionals
    • for laypersons
    • hello unknown
    • short version
    • long story short
    • about this website
  • blog
    • under construction
    • Air
    • books
    • Cool Nerdy Stuff
    • Community
    • Fire
    • Habitat
    • Pets
    • Pests
    • Plants
    • Soil
    • Water
  • Events
  • Contact
Menu

Life Property Environment

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number

Your Custom Text Here

Life Property Environment

  • Home
  • hello
    • howdy everyone
    • for design professionals
    • for landscape contractors
    • for maintenance professionals
    • for laypersons
    • hello unknown
  • about
    • short version
    • long story short
    • about this website
  • blog
  • resources
    • under construction
    • Air
    • books
    • Cool Nerdy Stuff
    • Community
    • Fire
    • Habitat
    • Pets
    • Pests
    • Plants
    • Soil
    • Water
  • Events
  • Contact

Fire “safe”?

September 11, 2020 Jennifer de Graaf
Photo by Scott Carroll on Unsplash

Photo by Scott Carroll on Unsplash

We hear these catch-phrases all the time:  Fire Safe, Fire Proof, Fire Wise, Firescape. 

They all convey a sense of security – like if we just “landscape” the right way, everything will be ok.  There’s almost a sense in these words that we can simply design landscapes to be fire wise, or firescaped, and ta-da!  Added safety is achieved, everybody goes home happy.   

The trouble is that while we love to use this language, to convey a feeling that we’re all doing the right thing, and that everything is going to be alright in the end, these terms don’t convey what they need to.   They lack accuracy.

Fire “safe” is like deer “proof”.  Those who have lived with deer know what that means.  There’s no such thing.  A young deer will sample just about every plant you have, leaving stubs in its’ wake.  A hungry deer will eat pretty much everything on the “deer don’t eat this” lists.  Then, if it likes the plants you so thoughtfully grew, it will come back repeatedly unless you lock your garden away in a fortress.  Even then, I’d bet on the deer.  Better to have plants the deer don’t like, and then hope every year is a good rain year so they won’t need to come for your supplemental garden foliage to enhance their banquet.

Likewise, I cannot design a garden to be safe from fire, and neither can anybody else.  There’s no fortress for this.  For every image of a garden left intact after a fire, there are countless others that burned, having done the same things.  Just like there’s no such thing as a plant that is truly deer proof, there isn’t a landscape that is immune to fire.  However, we can mitigate some of the risks by selecting less flammable building materials, laying hardscape in strategic places, avoiding the use of fire magnets, and so forth.  We can reduce many of the risk factors in our gardens and we can harden our buildings so that they are less easily ignited, but let’s stop using words that suggest safety.  The sooner we get super honest about how every little reduction in risk is a good thing, but no amount of them will ever make us “safe”, the better. 

Instead, I like to point out all the many, many ways we can make a property easier to escape from, how to harden a building, how to avoid the majority of pitfalls and work to make and maintain the garden (and structures) more sustainably.  Without sustainability at the core of the work, we aren’t helping to reduce the core reason things have gotten so bad and will continue to worsen.  Without sustainability, we’re just making things worse, no matter what we install.

You may also enjoy
Plant lists are a Starting point ONLY
Plant lists are a Starting point ONLY
Fire “safe”?
language, clients
Fire “safe”?
language, clients
language, clients
Jargon sucks
language, clients
Jargon sucks
language, clients
language, clients
Tags language, clients
Comment

Jargon sucks

January 16, 2020 Jennifer de Graaf
Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash

Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash

“People don’t care how much you know

until they know that you care.”

-Theodore Roosevelt.

Your client may be one of those who were directly impacted by a wildfire or maybe they know someone who was.  Whether this is your current clientele or not, it still seems important to take the extra few seconds to make sure that your client can see and hear that you care about mitigating the threat to them from wildfires. 

Rather than say ‘let’s create a defensible zone’, take a moment to explain what that particular zone is for, how it works, and what kinds of things will need to happen to keep it defensible.  A defensible zone isn’t just “created”, anyway – to suggest you can make one and walk away is irresponsible.  However, to some clients this may come across as sounding like defensible zones are more expensive and require all sorts of additional upkeep they don’t want to pay for.  They’re not, but by making a big deal about them, you run the risk of making it sound like an extra thing.  Doing work that results in spaces that are defensible needs to be just part of the process of making the right decisions for our clients’ properties, not something additional.  Something integral. Share that point with them and I hope you’ll avoid the pitfalls.

Likewise, when we discuss the flammability or “fire resistance” of plants, we need to be very careful.  No plant is inflammable, and fire resistance has multiple meanings.  Your client deserves the truth and they deserve to be able to trust that you understand the attributes of the plants you are proposing and what that means in the context of fire.  They should be able to trust that you aren’t just picking plant materials from some list without evaluating the appropriateness of those plants for the site, specific conditions around the site, and the changes that will happen over time.

Show them that you care enough to help them keep their landscape responsibly long-term and why that matters, and I bet you’ve got a start at something worth defending.

You may also enjoy
Plant lists are a Starting point ONLY
Plant lists are a Starting point ONLY
Fire “safe”?
language, clients
Fire “safe”?
language, clients
language, clients
Jargon sucks
language, clients
Jargon sucks
language, clients
language, clients
Tags language, clients
Comment

Talking about Defensible Space

January 11, 2020 Jennifer de Graaf
Photo by Andrew Gaines on Unsplash

Photo by Andrew Gaines on Unsplash

Confession: writing this post makes me a little nervous. It feels like the whole “fire world” is talking about defensible zones and trying to get people to design and maintain them. Here I am, the very phrase “defensible zone” is what I’m going to pick on. I would be lying if I said that I expect it to be well-received. …and I’ll be picking on it again in future blog posts. yikes.

There’s an unintended consequence of calling defensible space “defensible space” without being very clear to our clients about the expectations we can place on it.  For the uninitiated (a great many clients), to say we are making a “defensible space” sounds like not only will the space be defended, but that it will be defended successfully.  It sounds like a guarantee. That is a dangerous impression to spread; it runs the risk of offering false hope and allowing people to behave in dangerous ways during an emergency.  Panicked, stressed people will do panicky things anyway, but if their thinking starts out with errant understanding that they are supposed to be safe, I would put forth that we are doing them a disservice.

Don’t get me wrong, creating and maintaining a defensible space around your property is very important.  Guidelines and requirements vary, but it is an important concept and one that a design or maintenance plan can start with.  That’s awesome.

However, when we talk to clients, it is important to be clear that just having a defensible space doesn’t guarantee a good outcome during a fire emergency.  At a talk I gave in 2018, a homeowner who had lost her home in 2017 spoke to me at the break.  She had clearly done her homework and knew a lot about the prevailing guidelines for this.  My heart went out to her for the story she told – then she said something I shared with the rest of that audience and I share it with you.  I don’t have to paraphrase this, it was a powerful thing she said::

“You can do everything right and still lose your home.”

As landscape professionals working to serve our clients, we owe them the kindness of being clear and gentle with hard truths like these.  Don’t shirk it because it is a difficult conversation. Your clients need to be realistically informed before something happens rather than after.

You may also enjoy
Plant lists are a Starting point ONLY
Plant lists are a Starting point ONLY
Fire “safe”?
language, clients
Fire “safe”?
language, clients
language, clients
Jargon sucks
language, clients
Jargon sucks
language, clients
language, clients
Tags defensible, language, clients
Comment

Social Media

Basically everything is more important to us than selfies & tweets. However, you can find us elsewhere online at the links to the right —>

POWERED BY SQUARESPACE.